Why CGI Should Replace All Real Actors


For as long as Hollywood has been making movies its been making stars. The entertainment industry has been nurturing the cult of personality for over a century now, oftentimes with some shocking results. Society’s lust for drama both on and off screen has evolved as much as the technology used to create such stories. The entertainment industry of 2019 is now technologically advanced enough to eliminate the psychological detriment that stardom has on actors and the society that idolizes them.
Approximately fifty years ago, the first use of computer-generated imagery – otherwise known as CGI – was used in the 1973 sci-fi western, Westworld. Amounting to just 2 minutes of effects, the scene “took more than four months and tens of thousands of dollars to create.” Today these effects are now an industry standard and are oftentimes indistinguishable from reality. From mega-budget blockbusters to fifteen-minute Netflix episodes, CGI is changing the way we interpret visual storytelling.
In an article written by Safeera Sarjoo of hotcourses.com, she explains “Actors at their very core are story tellers. Art, acting and performance are an expression of life – our cultures, our worries, our love, our strengths, our weaknesses and our existential curiosity.” By those standards, a hyper realistic CGI character could easily fit the bill. Take for example the Netflix series, Love Death & Robots episode 16: Ice Age. For 15 minutes the viewer easily suspends all disbelief as rich CGI animation tells a fantastical story that would be impossible to convey just a few years ago.
Advancements in A.I. have taken facial recognition software to mind blowing levels. A few clicks of the refresh button on this site showing faces of people that don’t actually exist should convince anyone that the lines between technology and reality have officially blurred. Animation allows these renderings to come to life, as is in the case of this convincing “deep fake” of Barack Obama.
Traditional movie-making is disruptive as well with dozens of logistical issues such as location scouting, endless release forms, contracts with multiple cities, as well as teams for hair and makeup and catering. Money.com estimates that an A-list star on a $200 million movie can cost $15-$20 million with supporting and minor actors making $50 thousand each as well. Easily the talent alone is a major part of a movie’s budget. But what about the psychological cost?
You’d have to be living under a rock these days to not see the damaging effects that celebrity culture has on the world. Nearly every other month a new revelation is made into the personal lives of A-list celebrities and producers, from Harvey Weinstein and Kevin Spacey’s sexual harassment convictions to once child-actors turned adult train-wrecks like Lindsay Lohan or Amanda Bynes, it’s clear to see that something isn’t right with the entertainment industry.
The celebrity lifestyle culture media perpetuates has long protected serial rapists, pedophiles, drug addicts, and tuition scammers. In fact, even Barbra Streisand weighed in on the recent claims against Michael Jackson stating in an interview that she “absolutely believes the allegations of abuse by Robson and Safechuck.” She disgustingly added, “His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has. You can say ‘molested,' but those children, they were thrilled to be there. They both married and they both have children, so it didn’t kill them.”
These comments give a vivid glimpse into the mindset of those with major celebrity status and financial power. It is just a small fraction of the vile culture that Hollywood and the entertainment industry are guilty of. Over looking the negatives of this industry culture diminishes the art of hundreds of others who work on these films. With society’s tendency to mimic the actions of famous people, it is time to eliminate the need for real life actors and put the art back into film by way of CGI technology. We are already more than capable.

References:





Comments

  1. I love your writing! You have that musical flow which (to me) marks the difference between words on a page and true writing. To the content, it's an interesting proposition worth exploring. I think perhaps the future could have space for both CGI and live actors.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if the entertainment industry went to all CGI if we would wind up still seeing manufactured stories about these "celebrities" even if they are manufactured by computers.... Would there be CGI reality TV? Would there be a "Real Robots of Hollywood?" Great Post, that Barbra Streisand quote is unbelievable.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The title alone to this article had me intrigued. This is a fascinating opinion and as a movie lover, it's something I never though of before. Technology is very powerful, but I hope it doesn't get to the point of changing the entire movie industry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is such an interesting topic. I just watched that Michael Jackson documentary and was disgusted. I agree with your point. I also do not believe famous actors deserve millions of dollars while the world has countless problems with poverty. I'm sure the wealth wouldn't be dispersed regardless, however the "shield" of being famous and rich does allow some celebrities to take advantage of people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment